WHO's New Guidance to Counter Global Health Funding Cuts

WHO's New Guidance to Counter Global Health Funding Cuts

2025-11-03 population

Geneva, Monday, 3 November 2025.
WHO addresses severe funding cuts impacting health services worldwide with strategic guidance to sustain essential care, urging countries to prioritize health as a fiscal and political priority.

Strategic Approaches for Health Service Sustainability

In response to severe cuts in global health funding, the World Health Organization (WHO) has issued new guidance to assist countries in maintaining essential health services. This guidance emphasizes the need for countries to prioritize health in their fiscal and political agendas, recognizing health spending as an investment in social stability and economic resilience [1]. The WHO highlights that external health aid is projected to decline by up to 40% in 2025 compared to 2023, which could severely impact services like maternal care and vaccination by as much as 70% in some regions [1].

Data-Driven Strategies for Health Equity

The WHO’s guidance includes a series of policy recommendations aimed at mitigating the impact of funding reductions. These include prioritizing health services for the most impoverished populations and integrating externally-funded services into primary care models to ensure continuity and efficiency [1]. By leveraging health technology assessments, countries can allocate resources to services with the highest impact per dollar spent, thereby optimizing their health outcomes despite financial constraints [1].

Economic Implications and Quality Metrics

The economic implications of these funding cuts are profound, with the potential to undermine years of progress in global health. However, the WHO suggests that this crisis presents an opportunity to transition towards sustainable, domestically-funded healthcare systems [1]. Countries like Nigeria have already taken steps by increasing their health budgets to offset aid reductions, demonstrating a proactive approach to ensuring continued access to critical health services [1].

Successful Implementation Models

Several countries are exemplifying successful models in implementing WHO’s guidance. Ghana, for instance, has increased its health budget significantly by lifting caps on excise taxes earmarked for health insurance, resulting in a 60% increase in funding [1]. Similarly, Uganda has outlined policies to integrate health services, aiming to improve efficiency and sustain service delivery [1]. These examples underscore the potential for policy-driven approaches to maintain health service delivery amidst financial challenges.

Bronnen


health financing WHO guidance